Science Rubric
Level 4
There is evidence in this response that the student has a full and complete understanding of the question or problem.
- Pertinent and complete supporting details demonstrate an integration of ideas.
- The use of accurate scientific terminology enhances the response.
- An effective application of the concept to a practical problem or real-world situation reveals an insight into scientific principles.*
- The response reflects a complete synthesis of information.
Level 3
There is evidence in this response that the student has a good understanding of the question or problem.
- The supporting details are generally complete.
- The use of accurate scientific terminology strengthens the response.
- The concept has been applied to a practical problem or real-world situation.*
- The response reflects some synthesis of information.
Level 2
There is evidence in this response that the student has a basic understanding of the question or problem.
- The supporting details are adequate.
- The use of accurate scientific terminology may be present in the response.
- The application of the concept to a practical problem or real-world situation is inadequate.*
- The response provides little or no synthesis of information.
Level 1
There is evidence in this response that the student has some understanding of the question or problem.
- The supporting details are only minimally effective.
- The use of accurate scientific terminology is not present in the response.
- The application, if attempted, is irrelevant.*
- The response addresses the question.
Level 0
There is evidence that the student has no understanding of the question or problem.
- The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant or there is no response.
* On the High School Assessment, the application of a concept to a practical problem or real-world situation will be scored when it is required in the response and requested in the item stem.
Updated 2002