 |
Sample Item
Brief Constructed Response Item for Grade 6
|
Standard 5.0 Knowledge of Probability |
Topic C. Experimental Probability
|
Indicator 1. Analyze the results of a probability experiment |
|
Objective a. Make predictions and express the experimental probability as a fraction, a decimal, or a percent
Assessment limit: Use no more than 30 results in the sample space
|
|
Juan flipped a coin 20 times. The results are listed below.
| Heads |
Tails |
Tails |
Tails |
Heads |
| Tails |
Heads |
Tails |
Heads |
Tails |
| Heads |
Tails |
Heads |
Tails |
Heads |
| Tails |
Tails |
Tails |
Heads |
Heads |
Step A
Based on Juan's results, what is the experimental probability that the coin will land on heads the next time it is flipped?
Step B
Explain why your answer is correct. Use what you know about probability in your explanation. Use words, numbers, and/or symbols in your explanation.
Step A is scored 0 (Incorrect) or 1 (Correct) and assesses 5.C.1.a.
Step B is scored with a 3 point (0, 1, 2) rubric and assesses Processes of Mathematics.
|
| Answer Annotation |
Step A Answer: 
Step B Sample correct response: Since Juan flipped heads nine times out of 20, the number of favorable outcomes is nine and the total number of possible outcomes is 20. So the probability is 9 out of 20, or 45%. |
Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Rubric |
| Print: Scoring Rubric |
|
Score 2
The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of a problem.
- Application of a reasonable strategy in the context of the problem is indicated.
- Explanation1 of and/or justification2 for the mathematical process(es) used to solve a problem is clear, developed, and logical.
- Connections and/or extensions made within mathematics or outside of mathematics are clear.
- Supportive information and/or numbers are provided as appropriate. 3
Score 1
The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of a problem.
- Partial application of a strategy in the context of the problem is indicated.
- Explanation1 of and/or justification2 for the mathematical process(es) used to solve a problem is partially developed, logically flawed, or missing.
- Connections and/or extensions made within mathematics or outside of mathematics are partial or overly general, or flawed.
- Supportive information and/or numbers may or may not be provided as appropriate.3
Score 0
The response is completely incorrect, irrelevant to the problem, or missing.4
Note 1: Explanation refers to students' ability to communicate how they arrived at the solution for an item using the language of mathematics.
Note 2: Justification refers to students' ability to support the reasoning used to solve a problem, or to demonstrate why the solution is correct using mathematical concepts and principles.
Note 3: Students need to complete rubric criteria for explanation, justification, connections and/or extensions as cued for in a given problem.
Note 4: Merely an exact copy or paraphrase of the problem will receive a score of "0".
Rubric Document Date: August 2003
/share/rubrics/msa/mathematics/xml/bcr.xml
|
/share/assessment_items/xml/items/msa_math_6_026.xml