| Clarifications: Each clarification provides an explanation of the indicator/objective to help teachers better understand the concept. Classroom examples are often included to further illustrate the concept. While classroom examples could be shared with the students, the intended audience for the explanation/clarification is the classroom teacher-not the student. In addition, classroom examples may or may not reflect the assessment limits. |
Standard 2.0 Knowledge of Geometry |
Topic B. Solid Geometric Figures |
Indicator 2. Analyze the relationship between plane geometric figures and surfaces of solid geometric figures |
Objective a. Compare a plane figure to surfaces of solid geometric figure |
|
Assessment limit: Analyze or identify the number or arrangement of squares needed to make a cube and triangles/rectangles needed to make a triangular pyramid or rectangular pyramid. |
Clarification |
|
|---|---|
|
The van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought Pierre and Dina van Hiele are two Dutch educators who developed a model for developing geometric reasoning. Their model is based on a five-level hierarchy that all students move through as they develop their geometric understandings.
Students that are asked to analyze the types, numbers and arrangement of shapes that are the faces of a solid figure are moving from Level 0 to Level 1.
|
|
Classroom Example 1 |
|
|
Look at the cube below:
|
|
/instruction/clarification/mathematics/grade4/xml/2B2a.xml |
|
Resources for Objective 2.B.2.a: CLARIFICATIONS | Lesson Seeds | |