School Improvement in Maryland
Public Release Item Scoring Information Return

Goal 1 Reading, Reviewing and Responding to Texts

Expectation 1.1 The student will use effective strategies before, during, and after reading, viewing, and listening to self-selected and assigned materials.

Indicator 1.1.4 The student will apply reading strategies when comparing, making connections, and drawing conclusions about non-print text.

Assessment Limits:

  • Recognizing the implications of non-print text such as photographs, posters, art reproductions, cartoons, and stills from film or stage productions
  • Identifying an appropriate purpose for viewing non-print text
  • Confirming the usefulness or purpose for viewing a non-print text
  • Evaluating non-print text as it relates to a print text
  • Focusing on similarities and/or differences in purpose and effect across texts
  • Summarizing, comparing, drawing conclusions about, and synthesizing significant ideas between print and non-print text

Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Item - Released in 2006

Read the essay “Ghost Crab.” Then answer the following.

Carefully examine the details of the two photographs below.

Write a response that explains which photograph more effectively clarifies the images and ideas expressed in the essay “Ghost Crab.” In your response, support your conclusion with appropriate details from both the essay and the photograph you choose.

Use the space on page __ of your Answer Book for planning your response. Then write your response on the lines on page __.

The following 7 Anchor Papers represent a range of score points and are used in conjunction with the rubrics to assess student responses.

Anchor Paper #1

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #1: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response shows evidence of a minimal understanding of the texts. The student refers to a couple of the top photograph's features (water moving and no crabs) and includes some text support from the essay (I was filled with the odd sensation). The assertion (the author was imaging a crab near the sea) may indicate a misreading of the text.


Anchor Paper #2

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #2: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response shows evidence that some meaning has been derived from the texts. The student's choice of photo is supported by a comparison (this picture contains some ghost crabs and the other does not), and a quote from the text is provided ('there was no other visible life — just one small snow crab near the sea').


Anchor Paper #3

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #3: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a partial understanding of the texts. The student's choice of photograph is supported by expressed information ('there was no other visible life — just one ghost crab;' 'waves crashing on the beach'). An attempt at analysis is made (looks to be more from the ghost crabs point of view + that was how the man was trying to think); however, more clarity and extended understanding are needed for a higher score.


Anchor Paper #4

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #4: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a partial understanding of the texts. Although the first photo is rejected for two reasons, no crabs and no beach, the second is selected because ([it] includes the ghost crabs, the main topic of the essay; shows them 'just above the surf;' the delicate structure of the ghost crab is clearly seen). A brief fragment of interpretation is also given (because it is connected to the theme of how delicate life is).


Anchor Paper #5

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #5: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a partial understanding of the texts. The student provides both expressed information ('the distractions of daylight brings into sharper focus the elemental realities;' 'the delicate, destructible, yet incredibly vital force') and implied information (this photograph shows small crabs scuttling on the beach, and it is taken during nighttime; you can perhaps not see, but percieve things better at night) to support the choice of the bottom photograph. More clarification and extension beyond the literal is needed for the response to receive a higher score.


Anchor Paper #6

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #6: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response demonstrates an understanding of the complexities of the texts. The selection of the bottom photograph (ghost crabs similarly situated - battling the powerful tide) and the idea of "the simple beauty of the crabs" are supported by expressed information ('ghost crab lying in a pit he had dug just above the surf;' 'a creature in its own world'). Moving beyond the literal, the student clarifies and extends understanding through an in-depth interpretation of the photograph (symbolize the power of outside forces in Carson's essay; triumph of life over the 'harsh realities;' embodies the world of ideas about life itself that Carson strives to describe).


Anchor Paper #7

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #7: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: Through an interweaving of literal information and insight, this response demonstrates an understanding of the complexities of the texts. The student selects the top photo (the crab and the ocean as a 'symbol that stood for life itself') and demonstrates an understanding of the figurative significance of both the ocean (metaphor for the vast, harsh relentlessness of life) and the crab (metaphor for the way people overcome changes in life). The student further clarifies and extends understanding by emphasizing the peril of the crab (its alone, facing the ocean) An insightful conclusion completes this thoughtful response. (Photograph one represents the power of life, the vastness of it. Although there is no crab to stand up to the ocean, the photograph effectively describes the metaphor of the ocean as life described by Carson.)


Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Rubric

Print: Scoring Rubric (pdf)
Score 3

The response demonstrates an understanding of the complexities of the text.

  • Addresses the demands of the question
  • Uses expressed and implied information from the text
  • Clarifies and extends understanding beyond the literal
Score 2

The response demonstrates a partial or literal understanding of the text.

  • Addresses the demands of the question, although may not develop all parts equally
  • Uses some expressed or implied information from the text to demonstrate understanding
  • May not fully connect the support to a conclusion or assertion made about the text(s)
Score 1

The response shows evidence of a minimal understanding of the text.

  • May show evidence that some meaning has been derived from the text
  • May indicate a misreading of the text or the question
  • May lack information or explanation to support an understanding of the text in relation to the question
Score 0

The response is completely irrelevant or incorrect, or there is no response.

Revised March 2006

/share/clg/xml/public_release/english/2006_114_eng43.xml