| Public Release Item Scoring Information | Return |
|---|
Goal 1 Political Systems |
Expectation 1.1 The student will demonstrate understanding of the structure and functions of government and politics in the United States. |
Indicator 1.1.4 The student will explain roles and analyze strategies individuals or groups may use to initiate change in governmental policy and institutions. |
Assessment Limits:
|
Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Item - Released in 2002 |
|
|---|---|
The following 9 Anchor Papers represent a range of score points and are used in conjunction with the rubrics to assess student responses. | |
| Anchor Paper #1 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #1: Rubric Score 1 Annotation: This response is related to the question and shows only minimal knowledge. Fragments of a basic idea are presented (don't have as much money; want expensive stuff {but} can't get it); however, the idea is general and incomplete. |
|
| Anchor Paper #2 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #2: Rubric Score 1 Annotation: This response is related to the question and shows only minimal knowledge. Fragments of a basic idea are provided (more Democrats and Republicans); however, not only is this idea skeletal and incomplete, but also there is a significant misconception (there has never been a third party). |
|
| Anchor Paper #3 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #3: Rubric Score 2 Annotation: This response shows knowledge of the challenges faced by third parties. Complete basic ideas are provided (they don't have as many supporters; they don't have a lot of money to have a really good campaign). The response is adequate for a score of "2." |
|
| Anchor Paper #4 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #4: Rubric Score 2 Annotation: This response shows knowledge of the challenges faced by third parties. Basic ideas (advertising; most people side with one of the two parties) are given a little support (the U.S. government funds the two parties; do not listen to the third parties' ideas or beliefs). |
|
| Anchor Paper #5 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #5: Rubric Score 2 Annotation: This response shows knowledge of the challenges faced by third parties. Basic ideas (the two major parties block attempts; low public support) are provided with a little support (take advantage of majority; vast majority of Americans favor the two major parties). |
|
| Anchor Paper #6 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #6: Rubric Score 3 Annotation: This response shows some understanding of the challenges faced by third parties. Concepts are accurate and supported (don't have much money; struggle to make themselves recognized and to compete; something intelligent and meaningful to say to be better than your opponents). Some evidence of higher order thinking skills is provided through the application of relevant example and cause-and-effect reasoning (the Green Party had to have funds and in order to get that some had to believe they had a chance of winning). |
|
| Anchor Paper #7 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #7: Rubric Score 3 Annotation: This response shows some understanding of the challenges faced by third parties. Accurate concepts are supported (not likely to vote for these extremists; a long list of presidential contenders). The application of analysis and evaluation (most of America falls in the middle of the political scale; most voters have never heard of; maybe if there was only one strong third party seeking power they would be more successful) shows some evidence of higher order thinking skills. |
|
| Anchor Paper #8 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #8: Rubric Score 3 Annotation: This response shows some understanding of the challenges faced by third parties. Concepts are accurate and supported (advertising their campaign; the vast majority of supporters from the two dominate parties). Some evidence of higher order thinking skills is demonstrated through the application of analysis and evaluation (unknown to a vast majority; hard to gain the support of former supporters of another political party; hasn't yet been successful) and cause-and -effect reasoning (many are only aware of the Democratic and Republican parties {due to} the media; the media has grown to accept that the people's main focus {is} Democratic and Republican candidates; a third party leader hasn't yet been successful {so} the people don't want to chance it). |
|
| Anchor Paper #9 | |
Score for Anchor Paper #9: Rubric Score 4 Annotation: This response shows understanding of the challenges faced by third parties. Accurate concepts (unpopularity; lack of funding) are well supported. Extensive application of analysis and evaluation (have to fight much harder; cast into their shadows; people think they are restricted; substantial campaign money if the vote level exceeds a certain percentage for them and this rarely happens) and cause-and-effect reasoning (because people can't see these third parties they tend not to vote for them; they don't even get to hear their ideas so people think they are restricted; receives minimal campaign money because people don't expect them to go far; if the vote level exceeds and this rarely happens) demonstrate powerful evidence of higher order thinking skills. |
Additional Resources |
|---|
Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Rubric |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Print: Scoring Rubric (pdf) | |||||||
|
|||||||