School Improvement in Maryland
Public Release Item Scoring Information Return

Goal 3 Geography

Expectation 3.1 The student will demonstrate an understanding of the relationship of cultural and physical geographic factors in the development of government policy.

Indicator 3.1.1 The student will evaluate demographic factors related to political participation, public policy and government policies.

Assessment Limits:

  • Political causes and effects of reapportionment, redistricting and voting patterns.
  • Influence of demographic factors on government funding decisions.

Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Item - Released in 2005

In some eastern Arizona counties, the largest segment of the population is under 18 years of age. By contrast, in some western counties of Arizona, a large segment of the population is 65 years or older.

  • Based on the information above, describe likely government goals in both eastern and western Arizona.
  • Why do larger population groups tend to have more influence on government policy?
  • Include details and examples to support your response.

Write your answer on the lines in your Answer Book.

The following 8 Anchor Papers represent a range of score points and are used in conjunction with the rubrics to assess student responses.

Anchor Paper #1

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #1: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response is related to the question and shows only minimal knowledge. Although fragments of basic ideas are given (more people to vote; to protest), the ideas are skeletal and incomplete.


Anchor Paper #2

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #2: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response is related to the question and shows only minimal knowledge. The student provides skeletal and incomplete fragments of basic ideas (increase Social Security; state parks).


Anchor Paper #3

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #3: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response shows knowledge of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. Several correct goals (retirement plans; Medicare; Social Security benefits; pediatric medical attention; juvenile justice) and a complete key idea (tend to have more influence on government policy because American government is based on majority rule) are supplied.


Anchor Paper #4

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #4: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response shows knowledge of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. The student provides many correct goals (laws on drug and alcohol use; driving privileges; labor laws; Social Security; Medicare; retirement funds) and a complete key idea (government is run by the citizens, and if a large group wants something to benefit them, then government policy would change for them). Although a comparison of larger and smaller groups is attempted, more information/detail is needed to demonstrate evidence of higher order thinking.


Anchor Paper #5

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #5: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response shows some understanding of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. Concepts are accurate and supported (build more schools; protect the environment; set up heath care facilities). Some evidence of higher order thinking is demonstrated through the recognition of a governmental principle (majority rule with minority rights) and the use of cause-and-effect reasoning (taking more drastic action than a smaller body; start large protests and get more media coverage; getting the word out faster; if a large body of people are unhappy, there could be major consequences).


Anchor Paper #6

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #6: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response shows some understanding of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. Several correct goals are supplied (more Social Security; better health care; schools and college costs). Some evidence of higher order thinking is demonstrated through an analysis of the political system’s methodology (more representatives in the House; more likely to listen to you). The student also provides an appropriate analogy (if you had $100 to donate...).


Anchor Paper #7

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #7: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response shows some understanding of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. Many goals are cited (college funds; childcare; public school improvement; more facilities and activities for youth; drug and alcohol education and rehabilitation; Medicare). Some evidence of higher order thinking is demonstrated through an analysis of the way democracy works (role of government is to meet the needs of its constituents, and, since it cannot cater to all needs, would probably do most to meet the needs of a larger portion of the population).


Anchor Paper #8

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #8: Rubric Score 4

Annotation: This response shows understanding of why larger population groups have more influence on government policy. The student provides several correct goals (school buildings; nursing homes; parks). Powerful evidence of higher order thinking is demonstrated through cause-and-effect reasoning (if the government spends some of its budget benefiting the majority, they are more likely to obtain favor; ultimately votes) and extended analysis of the political system (leads to ‘pork barrel’ politics; the power of the purse string often equals political power in our system).


Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Rubric

Print: Scoring Rubric (pdf)
Score 4

This response shows understanding of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is insightful, integrates knowledge, and demonstrates powerful application.

  • The application shows powerful evidence of higher order thinking skills.
  • Concepts are accurate and well supported.
  • There are no misconceptions.
  • The response is comprehensive.
Score 3

This response shows some understanding of the content, question, and/or problem. The response includes appropriate application that demonstrates evidence of higher order thinking skills.

  • The application shows some evidence of higher order thinking skills.
  • Concepts are accurate and supported.
  • There are no interfering misconceptions.
  • The response may not develop all parts equally.
Score 2

This response shows knowledge of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is acceptable with some key ideas. The response shows little or no evidence of application.

  • The response includes some basic ideas.
  • The response provides little or no support.
  • There are minimal misconceptions.
Score 1

This response shows minimal knowledge of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is related to the question, but it is inadequate.

  • The response includes incomplete or fragmented ideas or knowledge.
  • There may be significant misconceptions.
Score 0

The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response.

Knowledge and Understanding indicate the degree to which the response reflects a grasp of the content, question, and/or problem presented in the stimulus. The response indicates mastery that progresses from knowledge to understanding.

Last Revised June 2001

/share/clg/xml/public_release/government/2005_311_gov06.xml